Reclaiming Hope by Michael Wear
When he started work for President Obama Michael Wear was very young and incredibly excited, especially when Obama spoke to the religious leaders at the first meeting of
the President’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neeighborhood Partmerships. Obama spoke about ‘importance of faith in his
own life and the positive role faith communities had to play in bringing our country
through the difficult times ahead. Wear hoped that divisive politics could be
overcome and faith could be part of that solution. The President had a different approach to
faith than over Democratic presidents.
He was willing to talk to religious leaders and he also realised that
there was an ‘evangelical reawakening to issues of justice and the common good’,
according to the author.
Although Wear was a
Democrat, he was not completely at ease in the party. He was very troubled by abortion and he
disagreed with the approach to matters of sex and sexuality. Gay marriage, for example, would become
extremely difficult to deal with.
Wear discusses Obama’s approach to religion profoundly. Obama was heavily criticised because he didn’t
go to church very often. However, explains that the attendance of the
President at church creates several security problems. But
does think that Obama was deeply religious.
Wear also writes about how Obama’s administration dealt with
abortion, contraception, and other areas which intersected with religion. What made him most disillusioned was Obama’s
attitude towards gay marriage. Obama’s
opposition to same-sex marriage was crucial in 2008 because of the importance
of winning over conservative white voters and many African-Americans. It was a
surprise to when he changed his mind in
2012. It was even more of a surprise
when Wear read a book by David Axelrod in which Axelrod wrote that the
president personally supported gay marriage as early as 2007 but he accepted
advice to support civil unions which he called ‘sacred’ unions. Wear was troubled by the possibility of
Obama’s misleading the public and using religious language to do it, although
he still admires the former president for many reasons.
This book was an interesting insight into what goes on
behind the scenes in Washington and I may even re-read it. However, I thought that it became rather
technical at times. I highly recommend
it for anyone interested in politics, and the intersection between religion and
politics.
I received this free ebook from Booklook Bloggers in return for an honest review.
Comments
Growing up in a country that has separation between church and state, it seems totally inappropriate for a President's religious beliefs (or lack of them) to be known by the public. If the head of state and politicians want to go to church, synagogue or mosque each week, they absolutely should do so, without journalists and photographers making it public. If the head of state and politicians want to legislate on topics like marriage equality and abortion, they have to do so without referring to their private religious beliefs.